I'm hanging outside the Starbucks at Granville and Broadway in Vancouver waiting for a bus. I see an older gentleman, white, perhaps early seventies, take a seat on one of the benches near the bus-stop. He is wearing a baseball cap and a dark jacket with a hood. He sits for a while, then casually gets up an walks towards the collection of newspaper boxes on the corner. I'm mildly concerned because he is leaving his bag unattended on the bench. This is a fairly busy, public area. So I keep an eye out. He returns with an armload of free weekly papers (today is Thursday which means new editions are out), walks past the bench and dumps the papers into a garbage can, only then returning to his seat-- all in the world is well.
After a few minutes I can't stand it anymore and walk over the the garbage can to see what paper he dumped. I see about twenty or so copies of Xtra West, the local edition of a Canadian free paper of gay and lesbian news.
So I approached the man and asked, 'I'm curious, why did you dump those papers in the garbage?” He opens his reply: "Do you know about the Bible?" I am now regretting my decision. He continues on for a bit about God, Satan, and Sodom & Gomorrah. Many of his teeth are crowned with gold. I suggest that although he is entitled to his opinion, what he did may be considered an act of vandalism, and perhaps the police might not view his actions as appropriate. He said something about me being in league with the devil. I said that was fine and left him.
A few minutes pass and we hear sirens, not surprising, being close to a fire station. He pulls his hood over his head. The trucks pass and he pulls his hood down again.
My bus arrives, bound for the ferry terminal and a small farming community to the south of Vancouver. I get on first and find a seat near the back. The man gets on afterwards and sits near the front. I don't know if he is aware or cares that I am there, doubtful.
A few stops down the road a young Asian boy, perhaps fourteen or fifteen, gets on the bus, carrying a guitar and wearing sunglasses -- an Elvis in the making. The old man quickly offers the boy a seat and strikes up a conversation.
Thursday, April 24, 2008
Thursday, April 03, 2008
No More Vancouver Sushi
Today I learned of a completely reprehensible and probably illegal practice of a particular Denman Sushi restaurant in Vancouver, British Columbia. Unfortunately I suspect that this kind of practice may be common in these types of restaurants.
The practice involves hiring servers on the condition that the server will pay a 6% cash premium on all food bills. The owners justify this premium as a sort of tip sharing program. The problem of course is that the server pays the premium whether they receive a tip or not from the customer. The restaurant owner further justifies this practice by explaining to the server that if they do a good job, the patron will give the server a good tip, presumably better than the 6% the owners are charging. They also hire only Japanese and Chinese new immigrants and students with poor English skills, people that generally would not report the owners, and that have difficulty finding jobs that aren't with AWs.
The owners of this particular restaurant themselves speak Cantonese, Mandarin and English fluently. The workers are told up front before being hired about the premium, and told that they will not be hired if they do not agree, and of course will be fired if they tell anyone about it.
Now this practice of 'tip sharing' has to be illegal from at least two perspectives.
The server is in essence paying to work at the restaurant. They have no guarantee of receiving tips and are expected to pay the hosts and bussers a percentage of their tips, as well as the enforced premium. Their wage is set at minimum wage for restaurant staff and a bad shift may effectively result in the server having to make a payback to the employer.
From the Government of B.C. Restaurant Employees Fact Sheet
In addition, through this practice of 'tip sharing,' the restaurant owners have also set up a very simple but effective way of under-reporting 6% of their gross revenue. This tip-sharing program is purely on a cash basis, and is done verbally at the end of the shift. The server's total food bill is added up, the 6% is calculated and the server pays this amount on the spot in cash. No record, no report.
I will never eat in this Denman Sushi restaurant again. And although I cannot name the restaurant here, I will be telling everyone I know about this disgusting practice and the name of the restaurant without hesitation.
I will also be filing a complaint against this particular restaurant with the Employment Standards Branch of the Government of British Columbia, and Revenue Canada.
It disgusts me to no end how these restaurateurs can take advantage of these young people simply because they don't understand their rights, the laws of Canada, and have difficulty with the language . May you rot in the hell you've created.
Restaurant Employees Fact Sheet
Employment Standards Act
The practice involves hiring servers on the condition that the server will pay a 6% cash premium on all food bills. The owners justify this premium as a sort of tip sharing program. The problem of course is that the server pays the premium whether they receive a tip or not from the customer. The restaurant owner further justifies this practice by explaining to the server that if they do a good job, the patron will give the server a good tip, presumably better than the 6% the owners are charging. They also hire only Japanese and Chinese new immigrants and students with poor English skills, people that generally would not report the owners, and that have difficulty finding jobs that aren't with AWs.
The owners of this particular restaurant themselves speak Cantonese, Mandarin and English fluently. The workers are told up front before being hired about the premium, and told that they will not be hired if they do not agree, and of course will be fired if they tell anyone about it.
Now this practice of 'tip sharing' has to be illegal from at least two perspectives.
The server is in essence paying to work at the restaurant. They have no guarantee of receiving tips and are expected to pay the hosts and bussers a percentage of their tips, as well as the enforced premium. Their wage is set at minimum wage for restaurant staff and a bad shift may effectively result in the server having to make a payback to the employer.
From the Government of B.C. Restaurant Employees Fact Sheet
The only lawful deductions that can be taken from pay cheques are those for Canada Pension Plan, Employment Insurance, Income Tax and any other deductions authorized by the employee in writing to pay on their behalf money to a union, charity, social fund, insurance company (medical, dental, insurance plan) or to meet a credit obligation.
In addition, through this practice of 'tip sharing,' the restaurant owners have also set up a very simple but effective way of under-reporting 6% of their gross revenue. This tip-sharing program is purely on a cash basis, and is done verbally at the end of the shift. The server's total food bill is added up, the 6% is calculated and the server pays this amount on the spot in cash. No record, no report.
I will never eat in this Denman Sushi restaurant again. And although I cannot name the restaurant here, I will be telling everyone I know about this disgusting practice and the name of the restaurant without hesitation.
I will also be filing a complaint against this particular restaurant with the Employment Standards Branch of the Government of British Columbia, and Revenue Canada.
It disgusts me to no end how these restaurateurs can take advantage of these young people simply because they don't understand their rights, the laws of Canada, and have difficulty with the language . May you rot in the hell you've created.
Restaurant Employees Fact Sheet
Employment Standards Act
Monday, March 24, 2008
RCMP Hides Taser Use
More than 2,800 Tasers are in use across Canada. The RCMP are supposed to report each incident of use or threatened use of Tasers. Records recently released to the CBC and the Canadian Press have been stripped of information of Taser use. This information was previously disclosed during 2002-2005 under the Access to Information Act.
The information that the RCMP did release shows that Taser use is up dramatically: over 1400 incidents in 2006, compared with about 600 incidents in 2005.
Liberal public safety critic comments that "The RCMP is a public police force" and that "they have to be transparent, they have to be accountable."
Not surprisingly, spokes-person Insp. Troy Lightfoot declined comment.
There have been at least nineteen Taser related deaths in Canada since 2001. An analysis by the Canadian Press of about 500 Taser incidents during 2002-2005 found that about 75% of these incidents involved unarmed suspects.
The now famous video of the death of Robert Dziekanski at Vancouver International Airport last October clearly shows how the Mounties are quick-to-draw the weapon on unarmed people.
The information that the RCMP did release shows that Taser use is up dramatically: over 1400 incidents in 2006, compared with about 600 incidents in 2005.
Liberal public safety critic comments that "The RCMP is a public police force" and that "they have to be transparent, they have to be accountable."
Not surprisingly, spokes-person Insp. Troy Lightfoot declined comment.
There have been at least nineteen Taser related deaths in Canada since 2001. An analysis by the Canadian Press of about 500 Taser incidents during 2002-2005 found that about 75% of these incidents involved unarmed suspects.
The now famous video of the death of Robert Dziekanski at Vancouver International Airport last October clearly shows how the Mounties are quick-to-draw the weapon on unarmed people.
Thursday, February 14, 2008
More Hidden Costs for 2010 B.C. Olympics
The B.C. government is offering partially paid leave to its 30,000 public servants if they volunteer for the 2010 Olympics.
B.C. government employees who volunteer for the Olympics will be able to claim part of that time as paid leave, said Colin Hansen, the minister responsible for the Olympics.
Hansen confirmed that in some cases the government will be hiring replacements for the paid volunteers.
Civil servants who do volunteer will also get vacation time bonus — for every two days they volunteer, they will only be deducted one day of vacation time, said Hansen. The rest will be made up as paid leave.
It is of course, inappropriate to pay people who choose to volunteer, because the volunteers would be using up their own vacation time while working for the Games.
Not surprising, VANOC is praising the proposal, saying it will bring workers with valuable skills to the so-called volunteer pool.
NDP Olympics critic Harry Bains, among others, criticize the plan, saying it could cost taxpayers millions of dollars and is another example of the hidden costs of the Games.
The program was also criticized by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, which said Olympic spending is already out of control.
B.C. government employees who volunteer for the Olympics will be able to claim part of that time as paid leave, said Colin Hansen, the minister responsible for the Olympics.
Hansen confirmed that in some cases the government will be hiring replacements for the paid volunteers.
Civil servants who do volunteer will also get vacation time bonus — for every two days they volunteer, they will only be deducted one day of vacation time, said Hansen. The rest will be made up as paid leave.
It is of course, inappropriate to pay people who choose to volunteer, because the volunteers would be using up their own vacation time while working for the Games.
Not surprising, VANOC is praising the proposal, saying it will bring workers with valuable skills to the so-called volunteer pool.
NDP Olympics critic Harry Bains, among others, criticize the plan, saying it could cost taxpayers millions of dollars and is another example of the hidden costs of the Games.
The program was also criticized by the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, which said Olympic spending is already out of control.
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Another Taser Death
Or, Another example of Canada's finest at their finest.
Near the end of the clip, one of the officers takes his club and uses the end of it on Dziekanski. Nice one guys.
It seems that the police are particularly jumpy in Vancouver. This taser death is not an isolated event. There is a long history of perceived police brutality in Vancouver, both with the RCMP and the local police force going back to the pepper spraying incidents at APEC to the more recent police shooting on Granville Street at 16th.
So I guess you have to be orderly and speak English while in Canada, because the police have no problem killing you in public.
post-script:
How the hell is Vancouver going to manage the Olympics?
Can you say "Police State"?
Near the end of the clip, one of the officers takes his club and uses the end of it on Dziekanski. Nice one guys.
It seems that the police are particularly jumpy in Vancouver. This taser death is not an isolated event. There is a long history of perceived police brutality in Vancouver, both with the RCMP and the local police force going back to the pepper spraying incidents at APEC to the more recent police shooting on Granville Street at 16th.
So I guess you have to be orderly and speak English while in Canada, because the police have no problem killing you in public.
post-script:
How the hell is Vancouver going to manage the Olympics?
Can you say "Police State"?
Monday, October 22, 2007
LiteFinder/1.0
Host: 74.53.249.34
Agent: Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; LiteFinder/1.0; +http://www.litefinder.net/about.html)
This is a horribly mis-configured spam bot. Best bet: forbid the damn thing from your site
Agent: Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; LiteFinder/1.0; +http://www.litefinder.net/about.html)
This is a horribly mis-configured spam bot. Best bet: forbid the damn thing from your site
Friday, August 24, 2007
Canada's Finest
This is how the police act in Canada. The three masked men in the video are actually police officers at a recent peaceful protest rally in Montreal Canada. Police officials originally lied about the officers and their roles: "Quebec's provincial force has flatly denied that its officers were involved in the incident." Yet a few days later:"The police admission came after several days of accusations from the protesters and denials from police that the three men were agents trying to provoke a confrontation between protesters and police."-CBC Canada story.
and
"At no time did the officers in question engage in provocation or incite anyone to commit violent acts," Insp. Marcel Savard.
Apparently pushing, shoving and carrying rocks are not violent acts, or an attempt to incite violence.
and
"At no time did the officers in question engage in provocation or incite anyone to commit violent acts," Insp. Marcel Savard.
Apparently pushing, shoving and carrying rocks are not violent acts, or an attempt to incite violence.
Thursday, August 02, 2007
Rizler Gets 30 years
Christopher William Smith gets 30 years for his 24 million dollar internet drug pharmacy. His co-workers get lighter sentences for their roles.
Just read the story at StarTribune.com.
Just read the story at StarTribune.com.
Tuesday, July 24, 2007
Garbage in Vancouver
Hey Sullivan,Why don't you put down your Olympic toys and do your job?
For example, get back to the table with CUPE Local 15.
Vancouverites are putting up with enough already, with the snarled traffic, and endless construction projects, never mind another extended garbage strike. So ya know what? F. your garbage plan.
It wouldn't surprise me if that millennial mess on Cambie starts to look like an Olympic size garbage dump.
Thursday, May 31, 2007
TMCrawler
Host: 128.241.20.206
Agent: TMCrawler
This bad-bot visited a site, grabbed the robots.txt twice and started to follow links at a very leisurely pace: just sub-directories over a couple of hours.
Then it started to explore a directory in a systematic fashion. It picked a sub-directory and began a numerical search: /directory/0, then /directory/1, and so on. I caught this bad-bot quickly because I have any 404 errors emailed to me immediately. I suspect it would have tripped a trap soon enough though.
Others have reported this bot as a WTF is this thing doing?
Based on its activites, I have simply decided to deny it access to my sites.
Agent: TMCrawler
This bad-bot visited a site, grabbed the robots.txt twice and started to follow links at a very leisurely pace: just sub-directories over a couple of hours.
Then it started to explore a directory in a systematic fashion. It picked a sub-directory and began a numerical search: /directory/0, then /directory/1, and so on. I caught this bad-bot quickly because I have any 404 errors emailed to me immediately. I suspect it would have tripped a trap soon enough though.
Others have reported this bot as a WTF is this thing doing?
Based on its activites, I have simply decided to deny it access to my sites.
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Beware of Telus
The future is not friendly. At least if you have an account with Telus, based in Alberta, Canada.
Telus offers telephone, cell-phone and internet services for individuals and businesses in in Alberta and British Columbia, Canada; and web-hosting for anyone who will sign up with a credit card.
Just try to close your account at the end of your service agreement, however. Telus keeps on charging your credit card, sometimes cancelling your service, sometimes not.
I've had three different accounts with Telus, web-hosting, telephone, and internet, and when I've tried to close them it was the same each time:
each time the service agreement was at an end, I gave them appropriate notice that I would be cancelling service. In each case, Telus either continued to charge my credit card monthly for the canceled and disconnected service, or send me a monthly bill for advance charges for services.
With the web-hosting account, Telus eventually did reverse the charges to my credit card: it took several emails on my part to draw their attention to their extra-billing.
When I canceled my phone service, they disconnected the service right on time. Nevertheless, the billing department didn't get the news: they continued to send me a monthly bill for the service. It took a letter of complaint to get the phone charges reversed.
I canceled my internet over the phone. They said no problem and sent me another bill for the upcoming month. I sent a notice in writing describing the extra billing, and re-affirming my notice of cancellation. They sent me a bill showing the outstanding amount from the previous bill -and new charges for the upcoming month, with a threat to disconnect service if I didn't pay up soon! Egads!
If this extra-billing is happening to me, I would expect that it is happening to many other Telus customers. It is too much of a coincidence that they would continue to bill on a closed account on three separate occasions.
Canceling a phone or internet service should not be this much work. Service agreement ends. Customer calls and cancels service, Company says thank you for your business, rather than continue to bill you.
Telus, your future will go down the tubes. Ask anyone on the street, your customer service is abhorrent and offensive.
Telus offers telephone, cell-phone and internet services for individuals and businesses in in Alberta and British Columbia, Canada; and web-hosting for anyone who will sign up with a credit card.
Just try to close your account at the end of your service agreement, however. Telus keeps on charging your credit card, sometimes cancelling your service, sometimes not.
I've had three different accounts with Telus, web-hosting, telephone, and internet, and when I've tried to close them it was the same each time:
each time the service agreement was at an end, I gave them appropriate notice that I would be cancelling service. In each case, Telus either continued to charge my credit card monthly for the canceled and disconnected service, or send me a monthly bill for advance charges for services.
With the web-hosting account, Telus eventually did reverse the charges to my credit card: it took several emails on my part to draw their attention to their extra-billing.
When I canceled my phone service, they disconnected the service right on time. Nevertheless, the billing department didn't get the news: they continued to send me a monthly bill for the service. It took a letter of complaint to get the phone charges reversed.
I canceled my internet over the phone. They said no problem and sent me another bill for the upcoming month. I sent a notice in writing describing the extra billing, and re-affirming my notice of cancellation. They sent me a bill showing the outstanding amount from the previous bill -and new charges for the upcoming month, with a threat to disconnect service if I didn't pay up soon! Egads!
If this extra-billing is happening to me, I would expect that it is happening to many other Telus customers. It is too much of a coincidence that they would continue to bill on a closed account on three separate occasions.
Canceling a phone or internet service should not be this much work. Service agreement ends. Customer calls and cancels service, Company says thank you for your business, rather than continue to bill you.
Telus, your future will go down the tubes. Ask anyone on the street, your customer service is abhorrent and offensive.
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Bad-Bot Trap Revisited
There seems to be an increase of late in bad-bot activity with new ips, and new user-agents. So I thought I would add a couple of ideas to flesh out my original A Simple PHP based Bad-Bot Trap that seems to be rather popular.
I'm flattered that people are posting and collecting the links to this blog. But some scum are stealing the articles and posting them on their own sites: you who do so will receive instant and debilitating bad karma as a result. Furthermore, you do not have permission to do so. May you experience endless server and php errors.
Just link, its nicer. If you have comments or suggests, go for it.
I offer the following with the standard disclaimer: If you don't understand the code, don't use it!
We can notice that the bots tend to follow the links on a page in one of three fairly predictable ways: top down, alphabetically ascending, and alphabetically descending. If we wish to trap a bad-bot early on in its travels through our site, we can easily set traps for each possibility using the original bad-bot trap and a little .htaccess magic.
First add the following rules to the robots.txt under User-agent: *
add to .htacess
Now we have three different traps to embed in our pages:
which can go at the top of the page
and
which can go pretty much anywhere on a page.
The traps should be self-evident as to their use. The Disallow: /nofile.html exclusion was added for that particular species of bad-bot that uses the robots.txt to find links.
Happy Trapping!
I'm flattered that people are posting and collecting the links to this blog. But some scum are stealing the articles and posting them on their own sites: you who do so will receive instant and debilitating bad karma as a result. Furthermore, you do not have permission to do so. May you experience endless server and php errors.
Just link, its nicer. If you have comments or suggests, go for it.
I offer the following with the standard disclaimer: If you don't understand the code, don't use it!
We can notice that the bots tend to follow the links on a page in one of three fairly predictable ways: top down, alphabetically ascending, and alphabetically descending. If we wish to trap a bad-bot early on in its travels through our site, we can easily set traps for each possibility using the original bad-bot trap and a little .htaccess magic.
First add the following rules to the robots.txt under User-agent: *
Disallow: /afile.html
Disallow: /zfile.html
Disallow: /nofile.html
add to .htacess
# set 'RewriteEngine On' if you haven't already
# redirect badbots
RewriteRule ^afile.* /badbots.php [L]
RewriteRule ^zfile.* /badbots.php [L]
RewriteRule ^nofile.* /badbots.php [L]
Now we have three different traps to embed in our pages:
<p style="color:white;background:white;height:0;visibility:collapse;"
onclick="return false" >
<a href="/badbots.php" >.</a>
which can go at the top of the page
<p style="color:white;background:white;height:0;visibility:collapse;"
onclick="return false" >
<a href="/afile.html" >.</a>
and
<p style="color:white;background:white;height:0;visibility:collapse;"
onclick="return false" >
<a href="/zfile.html" >.</a>
which can go pretty much anywhere on a page.
The traps should be self-evident as to their use. The Disallow: /nofile.html exclusion was added for that particular species of bad-bot that uses the robots.txt to find links.
Happy Trapping!
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Internet Explorer 7.0 (MSIE 7.0)
So, after spending some time with Internet Explorer 7.0 ( MSIE 7.0), I can't decide if its a move sideways or backwards. From a user's perspective, it certainly is prettier than MSIE 6. Unfortunately it's 'security' features get annoying really fast. Try it and you'll see what I mean.
From a web developer's perspective, its a pain in the butt. Though some of the problems of MSIE 6 have been addressed in 7, a whole new set of problems need to be dealt with: web pages that have hacks to get 6 to behave, have to be re-hacked now to get 7 to behave.
Hey Microsoft: can't you guys figure out how to handle 'float' properly? And javascript, sorry JScript, don't get me started. What the hell's the problem? Mozilla figured this stuff out long ago. Were you not at the table when the standards were developed? My god CSS 2 is almost 10 year old! Its as if you purposely undermine standards that you were involved in establishing, by releasing broken software like MSIE 7, in order to undermine your competition. Truly evil, Microsoft.
Do some bug comparisons between 6 and 7 if you like. A good place to start is http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/
So now we, as developers, have to maintain 3 sets of pages: one for browsers that actually work the way they are supposed to ( or at least try to address their bugs and short-comings in an open and timely manner), one for MSIE 6, and one for MSIE 7.
Egads, I feel dirty every time I have to use something created by Microsoft.
From a web developer's perspective, its a pain in the butt. Though some of the problems of MSIE 6 have been addressed in 7, a whole new set of problems need to be dealt with: web pages that have hacks to get 6 to behave, have to be re-hacked now to get 7 to behave.
Hey Microsoft: can't you guys figure out how to handle 'float' properly? And javascript, sorry JScript, don't get me started. What the hell's the problem? Mozilla figured this stuff out long ago. Were you not at the table when the standards were developed? My god CSS 2 is almost 10 year old! Its as if you purposely undermine standards that you were involved in establishing, by releasing broken software like MSIE 7, in order to undermine your competition. Truly evil, Microsoft.
Do some bug comparisons between 6 and 7 if you like. A good place to start is http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/
So now we, as developers, have to maintain 3 sets of pages: one for browsers that actually work the way they are supposed to ( or at least try to address their bugs and short-comings in an open and timely manner), one for MSIE 6, and one for MSIE 7.
Egads, I feel dirty every time I have to use something created by Microsoft.
Sunday, March 18, 2007
Trapped Bad-Bots
2007-10-22
Host: 74.53.249.34
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; LiteFinder/1.0;
+http://www.litefinder.net/about.html)
2007-10-18
Host: 99.238.107.208
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)
2007-10-08
Host: 213.189.25.182
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET
2007-10-06
Host: 82.99.30.27
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
2007-10-05
Host: 82.99.30.32
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
2007-10-05
Host: 131.107.0.95
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; SV1)
2007-10-03
Host: 67.19.250.26
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Gigamega.bot/1.0; +http://www.gigamega.net/bot.html)
2007-10-02
Host: 82.99.30.10
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
2007-09-10
Host:207.46.55.27/30
Agent: MSNPTC/1.0 (stupid ms bot can't parse robots.txt properly)
2007-07-13
Host:218.231.136.5
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP; DigExt)
2007-07-10
Host: 38.100.41.112
2007-07-06
Host: 209.85.94.164
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
+http://process4.com) Gecko/20070508 Firefox/1.5.0.12
stupid bot grabbed the robots.txt, then the first link listed in its exclusion list
2007-07-03
Host:74.208.71.84
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET
CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
2007-06-27
Host: 63.251.174.4
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET
CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
2007-06-26
Host: 24.87.89.186
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET
CLR 1.1.4322)
2007-06-22
Host: 64.92.199.41 and 64.92.199.41 (they have the whole block actually, I'm just banning the agent for a while)
Agent: libwww-perl/5.805
64.92.199.42
Agent: libwww-perl/5.805
2007-06-18
Host: 81.223.254.34
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT)
2007-06-15
Host: 201.5.229.201
Agent: Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; WebCapture 1.0; Auto; Windows)
2007-06-14
Host: 208.99.195.54
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
2007-06-05
Host: 202.179.180.42
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; NaverBot/1.0;
http://help.naver.com/delete_main.asp)
2007--05-26
Host: 24.242.34.213
Agent: MJ12bot/v1.2.0 (http://majestic12.co.uk/bot.php?+)
2007-05-25
Host: 84.88.32.199
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) Opera 7.23[ca]
2007-05-10
Host: 220.181.34.177
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; QihooBot
1.0 qihoobot@qihoo.net)
2007-04-26
Host: 65.222.176.124
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
2007-04-24
Host: 212.219.190.178
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT)
Host: 207.115.69.215
Agent: Mozilla/4.0/ (compatible- MSIE 6.0- Windows NT 5.1- SV1- .NET CLR 1.1.4322; ; )
Host: 65.222.176.125
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Host: 203.162.3.157
Agent: -
Host: 222.254.232.24
Agent: -
Host: 66.199.236.50
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0b; Windows NT 6.0)
Host: 69.84.207.39
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50215)
Host: 208.223.208.181
Agent: Python-urllib/1.16
Host: 208.53.147.89
Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; NetPositive/2.2)
Host: 70.87.196.242
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10)
Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6
Host: 65.222.176.122
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Host: 84.69.146.235
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
1.1.4322)
Host: 84.70.209.45
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
1.1.4322)
Host: 38.100.41.105
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Host: 38.100.41.102
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
The related block of ips hosting bad-bots that I've seen so far are in the range 38.100.41.100 - 38.100.41.107
Host: 88.198.7.39
Agent: findfiles.org/0.9 (Robot;robot@findfiles.org)
Host: 72.21.50.202
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; MSNIA; Windows 98)
Host: 65.222.176.123
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Host: 88.151.114.39
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Webbot/0.1; http://www.webbot.ru/bot.html)
Host: 74.53.249.34
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; LiteFinder/1.0;
+http://www.litefinder.net/about.html)
2007-10-18
Host: 99.238.107.208
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)
2007-10-08
Host: 213.189.25.182
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET
2007-10-06
Host: 82.99.30.27
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
2007-10-05
Host: 82.99.30.32
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
2007-10-05
Host: 131.107.0.95
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; SV1)
2007-10-03
Host: 67.19.250.26
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Gigamega.bot/1.0; +http://www.gigamega.net/bot.html)
2007-10-02
Host: 82.99.30.10
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)
2007-09-10
Host:207.46.55.27/30
Agent: MSNPTC/1.0 (stupid ms bot can't parse robots.txt properly)
2007-07-13
Host:218.231.136.5
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP; DigExt)
2007-07-10
Host: 38.100.41.112
2007-07-06
Host: 209.85.94.164
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
+http://process4.com) Gecko/20070508 Firefox/1.5.0.12
stupid bot grabbed the robots.txt, then the first link listed in its exclusion list
2007-07-03
Host:74.208.71.84
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET
CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
2007-06-27
Host: 63.251.174.4
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET
CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
2007-06-26
Host: 24.87.89.186
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET
CLR 1.1.4322)
2007-06-22
Host: 64.92.199.41 and 64.92.199.41 (they have the whole block actually, I'm just banning the agent for a while)
Agent: libwww-perl/5.805
64.92.199.42
Agent: libwww-perl/5.805
2007-06-18
Host: 81.223.254.34
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT)
2007-06-15
Host: 201.5.229.201
Agent: Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; WebCapture 1.0; Auto; Windows)
2007-06-14
Host: 208.99.195.54
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
2007-06-05
Host: 202.179.180.42
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; NaverBot/1.0;
http://help.naver.com/delete_main.asp)
2007--05-26
Host: 24.242.34.213
Agent: MJ12bot/v1.2.0 (http://majestic12.co.uk/bot.php?+)
2007-05-25
Host: 84.88.32.199
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) Opera 7.23[ca]
2007-05-10
Host: 220.181.34.177
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; QihooBot
1.0 qihoobot@qihoo.net)
2007-04-26
Host: 65.222.176.124
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
2007-04-24
Host: 212.219.190.178
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT)
Host: 207.115.69.215
Agent: Mozilla/4.0/ (compatible- MSIE 6.0- Windows NT 5.1- SV1- .NET CLR 1.1.4322; ; )
Host: 65.222.176.125
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Host: 203.162.3.157
Agent: -
Host: 222.254.232.24
Agent: -
Host: 66.199.236.50
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0b; Windows NT 6.0)
Host: 69.84.207.39
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50215)
Host: 208.223.208.181
Agent: Python-urllib/1.16
Host: 208.53.147.89
Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; NetPositive/2.2)
Host: 70.87.196.242
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10)
Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6
Host: 65.222.176.122
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Host: 84.69.146.235
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
1.1.4322)
Host: 84.70.209.45
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
1.1.4322)
Host: 38.100.41.105
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Host: 38.100.41.102
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
The related block of ips hosting bad-bots that I've seen so far are in the range 38.100.41.100 - 38.100.41.107
Host: 88.198.7.39
Agent: findfiles.org/0.9 (Robot;robot@findfiles.org)
Host: 72.21.50.202
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; MSNIA; Windows 98)
Host: 65.222.176.123
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Host: 88.151.114.39
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Webbot/0.1; http://www.webbot.ru/bot.html)
Saturday, December 16, 2006
BadVista.org
Before buying a new computer or moving to Vista, read what many techies already know and believe about the system at badvista.fsf.org
Thursday, October 19, 2006
MSIE 7 More Security Problems
Secunia.com has identified a security problem with the latest release of MSIE 7 which "can be exploited by malicious people to disclose potentially sensitive information." See details and sample test at http://secunia.com/advisories/22477.
Best to use the better browsers like Firefox and Opera.
Best to use the better browsers like Firefox and Opera.
Monday, October 09, 2006
BBC HoneyPot
The recent BBC article by Mark Ward describing an unprotected computer/honeypot set-up is nothing but a piece produced to create F.U.D. He describes how an unprotected XP computer is attacked repeatedly when connected to the internet. Of course, as with most tech articles produced by the BBC, the only operating system that seems to exist is Microsoft Windows.
The weaknesses in his article are explored on slashdot.org, so I won't rehearse them here.
Perhaps more interesting is the BBC/Microsoft memorandum of understanding "that aims to identify 'common interests' between the BBC and Microsoft. Areas for collaboration include search and navigation, distribution, and content enablement."
To purely speculate the relationship between BBC tech articles and the MS/BBC agreement:
Microsoft is going to have a hard time selling its upcoming release of the Vistas system, specifically, getting users of XP to upgrade, and to return ex-Microsoft users to the fold (for example all the college kids that bought new Apple laptops this year). MS will probably market the new system's "security" features as a main selling point.
Articles like the one produced by the BBC, that begin to explore the all too well known security problems in current Microsoft software, help prepare the marketplace for a new "secure" system, and condition consumers to see security as a need. The new Vistas OS will then present itself as the only viable solution to the problem.
Again, pure speculation. Nevertheless, when visiting the Vistas site on microsoft.com, there rarely is a page that does not mention security in some context. BBC articles on computer technology focus very heavily on the MS OS, almost to the exclusion of others.
The weaknesses in his article are explored on slashdot.org, so I won't rehearse them here.
Perhaps more interesting is the BBC/Microsoft memorandum of understanding "that aims to identify 'common interests' between the BBC and Microsoft. Areas for collaboration include search and navigation, distribution, and content enablement."
To purely speculate the relationship between BBC tech articles and the MS/BBC agreement:
Microsoft is going to have a hard time selling its upcoming release of the Vistas system, specifically, getting users of XP to upgrade, and to return ex-Microsoft users to the fold (for example all the college kids that bought new Apple laptops this year). MS will probably market the new system's "security" features as a main selling point.
Articles like the one produced by the BBC, that begin to explore the all too well known security problems in current Microsoft software, help prepare the marketplace for a new "secure" system, and condition consumers to see security as a need. The new Vistas OS will then present itself as the only viable solution to the problem.
Again, pure speculation. Nevertheless, when visiting the Vistas site on microsoft.com, there rarely is a page that does not mention security in some context. BBC articles on computer technology focus very heavily on the MS OS, almost to the exclusion of others.
Saturday, October 07, 2006
PSI/Cogent yet again
Host: 38.100.41.107
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Its getting tempting to just block everything in the range from
38.0.0.0 to 38.255.255.255, because the only visitors I've ever seen from this range are scum spam bots. Typical user-agents include Snapbot, voyager, cfetch, Java, as well as MSIE poser bots. They always run into a trap though, as the one listed here, and that keeps it fun.
Whois:
OrgName: Performance Systems International Inc.
OrgID: PSI
Address: 1015 31st St NW
City: Washington
StateProv: DC
PostalCode: 20007
Country: US
Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows XP)
Its getting tempting to just block everything in the range from
38.0.0.0 to 38.255.255.255, because the only visitors I've ever seen from this range are scum spam bots. Typical user-agents include Snapbot, voyager, cfetch, Java, as well as MSIE poser bots. They always run into a trap though, as the one listed here, and that keeps it fun.
Whois:
OrgName: Performance Systems International Inc.
OrgID: PSI
Address: 1015 31st St NW
City: Washington
StateProv: DC
PostalCode: 20007
Country: US
The New iPOD WOW!! (or not)
Red Hot Chilli Peppers, U2, and now . . . wait for it . . .
Tetris!!
Sorry Steve, iPod has officially lost its cool.
Perhaps the movie business will save ya.
Tetris!!
Sorry Steve, iPod has officially lost its cool.
Perhaps the movie business will save ya.
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
Nusearch Spider
Agent: Nusearch Spider (www.nusearch.com)
Host: 84.9.136.223
The Nusearch Spider dropped by for a visit. It only followed the first ten top-level html links. It was not interested in going to other directories, and even tried to load directory-names as files by dropping the trailing "/" then ignoring the resulting redirect.
The Spider obeyed some of the directives in the robots.txt, but not all. My guess its a configuration issue with the bot at this time. We will be watching them to see what's up.
I dropped by their site, nusearch.com and its yet another search engine promising to be better than the other guys. Ya whatever, but they need to get their bot under better control, and clean up it's blacklist status if they want us to allow them to crawl our sites.
Host: 84.9.136.223
The Nusearch Spider dropped by for a visit. It only followed the first ten top-level html links. It was not interested in going to other directories, and even tried to load directory-names as files by dropping the trailing "/" then ignoring the resulting redirect.
The Spider obeyed some of the directives in the robots.txt, but not all. My guess its a configuration issue with the bot at this time. We will be watching them to see what's up.
I dropped by their site, nusearch.com and its yet another search engine promising to be better than the other guys. Ya whatever, but they need to get their bot under better control, and clean up it's blacklist status if they want us to allow them to crawl our sites.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)